Document Crunch

What Document Crunch does

Document Crunch is an AI document and risk workflow platform for construction teams. It helps users review contracts and related project documents, locate obligations and turn findings into work for the appropriate people. The intended audience includes preconstruction teams, project managers, risk managers and legal reviewers who need to follow an issue from an early contract review through project delivery.

Construction-specific document analysis

CrunchAI is the analysis layer. Document Crunch describes it as working across contracts, specifications, drawings, addenda and flow-down terms, including relationships that can change the meaning of a requirement. Responses are designed to reference the source with page numbers and highlighted clauses, so a reviewer can examine the provision behind a finding.

This cross-document context matters when an obligation is changed by an addendum or when a specification and contract appear inconsistent. The product supports review and source inspection; it does not remove the need to determine which documents govern or how a provision applies to the project. Its own explanation keeps accountability with the user.

From review to project action

The platform includes Project Assist for questions across project information and drafts of artifacts such as notices, submittals and RFIs. Teams can encode their standards in reviews or playbooks, assign risks and track whether items are open, overdue or complete. The homepage also describes contract redlining, version comparison, specification checks and access from smartphones and tablets.

For example, a preconstruction reviewer could assemble a proposed contract, relevant specifications and the latest addenda. Ask about a notice obligation, inspect the cited text and compare any conflicting provisions. Route the issue to the person responsible for clarification and record the agreed resolution. Before the project moves to operations, ensure that the team receives the applicable obligation and the source version used in the review.

During delivery, a project manager could ask a focused question about that obligation and use a draft notice as a starting point. A responsible reviewer should confirm the facts, recipient, timing and contractual basis before issuing anything. Generated text should pass through the project’s normal authorization process.

Document and judgment limits

A useful answer depends on complete, current project records. Missing exhibits, superseded addenda or an incorrect document version can undermine a review even when the response includes a citation. Resolve those source issues before relying on an apparent inconsistency. A source reference supports inspection; it is not a guarantee that every risk has been found or that a legal conclusion is correct.

Review data access and retention for confidential contracts. The vendor’s security page describes encryption and an SSO option. Confirm the controls and agreement relevant to your organization rather than treating a general product statement as approval for every project.

Pricing and access

Document Crunch directs prospective users to a demo and a free-trial entry point. Obtain the current commercial terms and confirm the available modules, user access, project allowances and any trial restrictions. A public trial button alone does not establish a specific duration or unlimited access to Project Assist and every review capability.