Research assistants serve different parts of a review: discovery, paper reading, extraction and citation context. Choose the step that slows your work before choosing a platform.
Compare how each tool links to the paper, handles study details and lets you export a reading list or evidence table. A clear summary is useful only when the methods and limitations stay visible.
Elicit helps researchers find papers and organize information from them. Its research workflows are useful for literature review tasks where the details of each study need to remain visible and comparable.
Define the inclusion criteria for a small review. Check a sample of extracted study details against the papers before expanding the table.
scite helps readers explore how research papers are cited and discuss scientific questions with source-backed assistance. Citation context can help you decide which papers to read more closely, especially when a claim has a mixed evidence base.
Start with a paper or claim and inspect the surrounding citation passages. Read the cited study when the context affects your conclusion.
Scholarcy turns research reading into structured summaries and study material. It is useful for getting oriented in a long paper before reading the sections that matter to your question.
Use the summary to locate the methods and results you need. Record your own notes alongside the paper so limitations do not disappear when the summary is shortened.
Bring the same example to each tool you compare. Keep the original input and the edits you make to the result, so you can see where each option helps. Check the exported output in the next step of your work, rather than judging only the preview inside the application.
Before choosing a plan, check the product website for current access, usage limits and supported integrations. A useful shortlist matches the task you need to finish and the way you will reuse the result.